requestId:684c3e4a9e23f3.93133831.
“Telling without doing” and the rejuvenation of civilization
——A method of reconsideration of Chinese Philosophy from a non-objective reflection on civilization
Author: Xu Bing (District of Philosophy in Northeast Political and Law)
Source: “Shandong Administrative Academy News” Issue 2, 2021
Abstract
There are in Chinese Philosophy Research博官网 is more obvious in favor of the internal transformation of historical materials and the interpretation of principles, and is obscure the request for reconstruction of Chinese thinking civilization. This form of research is actually related to the objectification of civilization understanding and the misunderstanding of civilization subjectivity. Confucius, facing the historical mission of the reconstruction of the tribute and lofty civilization, emphasized that his own mission nature is “describing but not doing”, had a clear understanding of the non-objective reflective characteristics of civilization, expressed his own understanding of the method of academic research in the reconstruction of civilization, and tried to avoid the abstract and artificiality of “describing” the “description” of civilization tradition. Therefore, this asks the authors to agree with the personalized value of classics, thus forming a common theoretical domain and the world of thinking, affecting all aspects of humanistic construction fields such as academic research, literary creation, and social education, and gradually constructing a civilized community with a civilized subjective idea, which will effectively affect the social life of the people, so that the revival of Chinese civilization can be yet to be.
1. Chinese Philosophy平台生女平台生女平台生女平台生女
Since modern times, Chinese civilization has faced the “large change in three thousand years” and the Chinese traditional thinking science has begun to reflect on the research on Chinese philosophy. Although it has been working hard to convert modern academics for more than a hundred years, the research and positioning of Chinese traditional thinking has always been a problem that needs to be discussed. How to understand the valuable energy of Chinese civilization and how to conduct philosophical and profound discussions on it? With the grand development of transformation and opening up over the past 40 years, the urgent request of the National Rejuvenation Restoration to rebuild the subjective nature of China’s ideological civilization has become increasingly prominent.
The revival of the Chinese people is said from the most basic perspective to the revival of the Chinese civilization. Without the internal recognition and internal influence of the Chinese civilization, without the meaning of safety for the lives of the Chinese people from the head, without the grand influence and value of other ethnic groups, without the wide influence and value of human society, we cannot talk about the true nature of the Chinese people.Rejuvenation. The focus of civilization is the valuable energy that is contained in the classical text thinking content (Chinese thinking is traditionally called “Tao”). Whether it is how to understand the meaning of philosophy or how to understand the thinking nature of Chinese civilization, use the method of philosophical thinking to “distinguish the name and analyze the reason” to construct the theoretical concept of Chinese traditional thinking, and “understand” the connotation of Chinese civilization, it is undoubtedly a fundamental influence in the task of reconstruction of the subjectivity of civilization. Although it has suffered strong impact from Eastern civilization in modern times, due to the potential accumulation of traditional and educational cultivation that students had extensively possessed at that time, the Chinese philosophy research has not fallen into the subjective consciousness at a very large level. Instead, due to the comfort and motivation of Eastern philosophy, the Chinese philosophy research has accumulated the last batch of valuable thinking results that can communicate Chinese and Western cultures and have modern academic forms for tomorrow. Later, due to the historical roots, the original research on Chinese philosophy was more prominent in Hong Kong. Since the new era of transformation and opening up, the Mainland Chinese Philosophy Research and Research have gradually achieved some descriptive thinking results, and have made constructive theoretical contributions to the modern transformation of Chinese traditional thinking. But overall, compared with the research status of Eastern Philosophy and Marxism in the “Three-Driving Horse” of the Chinese, Western and Horses in the philosophical field, the face made her look haggard in front of the heroine with an indescribable look. There are some obvious biases in the research on national philosophy: either it is expressed as piled up data, lack of thinking, or it is expressed as replacing the problems of philosophy with a single-face philosophical history sorting and philosophical discussion, or it is expressed as using single-face literacy considerations and textual interpretation as the authenticity of governing the country, or it is expressed as abstractly comparing Chinese and Western philosophy, explaining the internalization of principles. In short, there may be a lack of philosophical problem consciousness, or there may be a lack of historical civilization consciousness, or there may be no philosophical nature, or there may be no Chinese flavor.
Philosophy Research Of course, it is not enough to study the history of philosophy, the sorting out literature, the sorting out ancient books, the training and consideration of language and characters, and even history and archaeology. However, all the pure intellectual research and discussion tasks of “eat the food of our predecessors” are not philosophical research and study, but it is just a prepared external task. It cannot replace the thinking guide with literary research and discussion. Of course, the philosophical thinking cannot be separated from the borrowing of various theoretical resources and the analysis of concepts, but it cannot be used to treat Chinese philosophy as a comparative form of internal theoretical discussion, and cannot be used to analyze the propositions of artistic concepts in Chinese philosophy in abstraction. This kind of research is not a real Chinese philosophy research, or even a philosophical research. This kind of makeup that exists in the Chinese philosophy research. Then, she looked down at the audience and saw several internalized states in sorting out historical materials and explaining principles, which were obscure in the theoretical request of China’s thinking civilization reconstruction. Philosophy is the metaphysical form of civilization, so it is based on it.This form of research is actually related to the objectification of civilization understanding and the misunderstanding of civilization subjectivity. For our own ideological civilization tradition, we cannot (actually cannot) adopt an inherently “objective” theoretical attitude, and for the Eastern Ideological civilization resources, we cannot adopt an abstract “take-up theory”. Without the self-consciousness of civilization, the activation of traditional thinking and the reception of Eastern thinking are ineffective. The abstract civilization attitude of “taking the essence and discarding the dross” seems neutral and objective, but it actually happens to be a manifestation of value drop. Imagination is transcendent to civilization tradition and establish a “new civilization” in a tree, just as absurd to itself. In fact, it is a self-destruction of civilization. As a result, it will lead to the immorality of civilization and the emptiness of value, which will lead to the abstraction of ethnic energy and the utilitarian career. On the other hand, the subjectivity of civilization is not only established by single-dimensional literary sorting, textual considerations, common-level so-called thoughts or decorations or citations with added seasonings. This kind of research seems to have a very “Chinese vocabulary”, but in fact it is a kind of research on the intellectual nature of antiques made by the museum of Chinese Civilization and the interpretation of Chinese philosophical thinking in a vulgar, stylized, and emotional way.
2. The non-objective reflection of civilization and the principle of “describe but not committing” thinking
(I) The non-objective reflection of civilization
Civilization is divided into knowledge, and the construction of civilization is not a scheming of knowledge. Knowledge from ancient and modern times, both at home and abroad can be used directly for my use, because knowledge is objectified, but a rooted civil civilization cannot be removed or allowed to be used. It happens to be the reason why the “I” of the cognitive subject can be obtained, and it will no longer be objectified and understood. Civilization is not a piece of clothing that can be removed whenever you want or replaced when you want, but it is what people are themselves. Most people who have left the boundary of historical civilization tradition can only exist in the non-human way of “wolf children” and “pig children”. Even wolf children and pig children have the specificity of wolf or pigs (although it is not civilized), so there is no real existence of “hu
發佈留言